Pros And Cons Of Accelerated Reader Program

The Accelerated Reader (AR) program is a widely implemented reading initiative used in schools to encourage students to read more and improve their literacy skills. Developed by Renaissance Learning, the program involves students reading books at their appropriate reading levels and then taking quizzes to test their comprehension.

While the AR program has been praised for its ability to motivate students and track their reading progress, it has also faced criticism regarding its effectiveness and impact on students’ attitudes towards reading. This article explores the pros and cons of the Accelerated Reader program, providing a comprehensive understanding of its influence on students’ reading habits and educational outcomes.

Pros Of Accelerated Reader Program

1. Encourages Reading

Motivation Through Rewards

The AR program incentivizes reading by offering points and rewards for successfully completing quizzes. This system of rewards can motivate students to read more books and improve their reading skills. A study published in the Journal of Educational Psychology found that the use of rewards in reading programs like AR can significantly increase students’ reading frequency and engagement.

Goal Setting

AR allows students to set personal reading goals, which can foster a sense of accomplishment and boost their confidence. By achieving these goals, students develop a positive attitude towards reading and are more likely to become lifelong readers. Research in the Journal of Literacy Research indicates that goal-setting in reading programs can enhance students’ motivation and commitment to reading.

2. Improves Reading Comprehension

Tailored Reading Levels

The AR program assesses students’ reading levels and recommends books that match their abilities. This personalized approach ensures that students are reading texts that are neither too easy nor too difficult, which can improve their comprehension skills. A study in the Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy found that reading at an appropriate level is crucial for developing strong reading comprehension skills.

Immediate Feedback

The quizzes that follow each book provide immediate feedback on students’ understanding, helping them identify areas for improvement. This real-time feedback can enhance learning and reinforce comprehension skills. Research in the Reading Research Quarterly suggests that immediate feedback is effective in improving students’ reading comprehension and retention.

3. Tracks Progress

Data-Driven Insights

AR provides teachers with detailed reports on students’ reading progress, including the number of books read, quiz scores, and comprehension levels. These insights allow educators to tailor instruction to meet individual students’ needs and monitor their development over time. A study in the Journal of Educational Technology & Society found that data-driven insights from programs like AR can improve instructional strategies and student outcomes.

Identifying Struggling Readers

The program helps identify students who may be struggling with reading, allowing for timely intervention and support. Early identification and intervention can prevent long-term reading difficulties and promote academic success. Research in the International Journal of Educational Research indicates that early intervention is critical for helping struggling readers catch up with their peers.

4. Promotes Independent Reading

Student Choice

AR offers a wide selection of books, giving students the freedom to choose what they want to read. This autonomy can foster a love of reading and encourage independent reading habits. A study in the Journal of Research in Reading found that allowing students to choose their reading materials can significantly increase their motivation and engagement.

Encourages Self-Directed Learning

By providing a structured yet flexible framework, AR encourages students to take ownership of their reading progress. This self-directed learning approach can develop critical thinking and self-regulation skills. Research in the Journal of Educational Research suggests that self-directed learning is beneficial for academic achievement and personal growth.

Cons Of Accelerated Reader Program

1. Overemphasis On Testing

Stress and Anxiety

The frequent quizzes in the AR program can cause stress and anxiety among students, particularly those who struggle with test-taking. This pressure can detract from the enjoyment of reading and negatively impact students’ attitudes towards reading. A study in the Journal of Educational Psychology found that high-stakes testing can increase anxiety and reduce intrinsic motivation for reading.

Focus on Points Over Learning

Some students may focus more on earning points and rewards rather than truly engaging with the material and developing a love for reading. This emphasis on extrinsic motivation can undermine the intrinsic joy of reading. Research in the Journal of Experimental Education suggests that an overemphasis on extrinsic rewards can diminish students’ intrinsic motivation for learning.

2. Limited Book Selection

Restricted Choices

While AR offers a wide range of books, the selection may still be limited compared to students’ interests and needs. Some students may find it difficult to find books that truly engage them, leading to decreased motivation to read. A study in the Journal of Literacy Research found that limited book choices can negatively impact students’ reading engagement and motivation.

Cultural Relevance

The books available in the AR program may not always reflect the diverse cultural backgrounds and experiences of all students. This lack of representation can make it challenging for some students to find relatable and meaningful reading material. Research in the Journal of Multicultural Education indicates that culturally relevant texts are essential for engaging diverse student populations and promoting literacy development.

3. Quality Of Quizzes

Surface-Level Questions

The quizzes in the AR program often focus on basic recall and comprehension rather than critical thinking and deeper analysis. This can limit students’ ability to engage with the text on a more meaningful level. A study in the Journal of Educational Psychology found that surface-level questioning can restrict students’ critical thinking and analytical skills.

Inconsistent Quality

The quality of the quizzes can vary, with some questions being poorly designed or ambiguous. This inconsistency can frustrate students and impact their performance and motivation. Research in the Journal of Educational Measurement suggests that inconsistent and poorly designed assessments can negatively affect students’ learning experiences and outcomes.

4. Potential For Cheating

Access to Answers

With the widespread availability of AR quizzes and answers online, there is a potential for students to cheat by looking up answers before taking the quiz. This undermines the program’s integrity and can result in inaccurate assessments of students’ reading abilities. A study in the Journal of Educational Technology & Society found that access to online answers can compromise the effectiveness of computerized assessment programs.

Lack of Authentic Assessment

The reliance on multiple-choice quizzes may not accurately reflect students’ true reading comprehension and critical thinking skills. Authentic assessment methods, such as open-ended questions and discussions, may be more effective in evaluating students’ reading abilities. Research in the Journal of Literacy Research suggests that authentic assessments provide a more comprehensive understanding of students’ reading skills and knowledge.

5. Equity And Accessibility Issues

Access to Resources

Not all schools have equal access to the resources required to implement the AR program effectively. Schools in low-income areas may struggle to afford the necessary books, technology, and support services. This inequity can widen the achievement gap between students from different socioeconomic backgrounds. A study in the Journal of Education Finance found that disparities in resource allocation can impact the effectiveness of educational programs and student outcomes.

Impact on Diverse Learners

The AR program may not fully address the needs of diverse learners, including English language learners (ELLs) and students with learning disabilities. These students may require additional support and accommodations that the AR program does not provide. Research in the Journal of Special Education Technology suggests that educational programs must be inclusive and adaptable to meet the diverse needs of all learners.


The Accelerated Reader program has both strengths and weaknesses, and its impact on students’ reading habits and educational outcomes can vary widely. On the positive side, AR encourages reading, improves reading comprehension, tracks progress, and promotes independent reading. These benefits can enhance students’ literacy skills and foster a love of reading.

However, the program also has significant drawbacks, including an overemphasis on testing, limited book selection, quality concerns with quizzes, potential for cheating, and equity and accessibility issues. These challenges can undermine the program’s effectiveness and impact students’ motivation and engagement with reading.

To maximize the benefits of the AR program, it is essential to address its limitations. This may involve diversifying the book selection, improving the quality of quizzes, incorporating more authentic assessment methods, and ensuring equitable access to resources and support for all students. By addressing these issues, the AR program can better support students’ literacy development and foster a lifelong love of reading.

Ultimately, the success of the Accelerated Reader program depends on thoughtful implementation and ongoing evaluation. Educators, parents, and policymakers must work together to create a supportive and engaging reading environment that meets the needs of all students. By doing so, we can ensure that every child has the opportunity to develop strong reading skills and a passion for learning.

Leave a Comment